Turn-by-turn micro-linguistic analysis of interpreting strategies and communicative functions in Lampung–English virtual tourism encounters

Bungsudi Bungsudi

doi:10.37598/accentia.v5i2.2517

Turn-by-turn micro-linguistic analysis of interpreting strategies and communicative functions in Lampung–English virtual tourism encounters

Bungsudi Bungsudi

Abstract

This study examined Lampung–English interpreting in a virtual tourism encounter, focusing on how indigenous languages function in online cross-cultural communication. A qualitative single-case study was conducted on a 20-minute Zoom session involving a native Lampung speaker, an English-speaking participant, and a bilingual student interpreter. The conversation was transcribed and analyzed thematically to identify interpreting strategies and their communicative roles. Findings revealed three main strategies: (1) literal translation with retention of local place names to ensure accuracy, (2) retention combined with short explanations to clarify culture-specific terms, and (3) pragmatic adaptation to align messages with international tourism discourse. These strategies served different functions, including providing information, promoting culture, and building rapport. Micro-level analysis also showed how interpreters used word choices, cohesion, and additional explanations to overcome the lack of visual cues in online communication. The study introduced a simple framework: accuracy, culture, and audience, which explains how interpreters balance factual precision, cultural authenticity, and audience expectations. This highlights the interpreter’s role not only as a language mediator but also as a cultural ambassador in digital tourism. The study contributes to the limited research on indigenous language interpreting, while offering practical insights for interpreter training, curriculum design, and the promotion of local culture through virtual tourism.

Keywords

Lampung–English Interpreting; Virtual Tourism Discourse; Cultural Mediation; Interpreting Strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, C. U., Wulung, S. R. P., Ruhimat, M., & Arrasyid, R. (2020). An analysis of tour guides’ multilingualism in the city of Bandung, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 29(2), 177–185.

Abigail, M. (2023). Pengaruh eksistensi bahasa Lampung terhadap pengembangan pariwisata di Kabupaten Lampung Barat. PUSTAKA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pendidikan, 3, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v3i4.704

Afandi, R. A., Ferianda, S., Febiola, T. V., & Susanti, T. A. (2025). Interpreting practice proficiency: Indonesia to English in socio-economic revitalization in Sungailiat tourism sector based on a survey study. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i1.1096

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Braun, S. (2015). Remote interpreting. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting (pp. 352–367). Routledge.

Braun, S., & Taylor, J. (2012). Video-mediated interpreting: An overview of current practice and research. In Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings (pp. 27–52). Intersentia.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buján, M., & Collard, C. (2022). Remote simultaneous interpreting and COVID-19: Conference interpreters’ perspective. In K. Liu & A. K. F. Cheung (Eds.), Translation and interpreting in the age of COVID-19 (pp. 133–150). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6680-4_7

D’Hayer, D. (2012). Public service interpreting and translation: Moving towards a (virtual) community of practice. Meta: Journal des Traducteurs,, 57(1), 235–247. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.7202/1012751ar

Dann, G. M. S. (2012). Tourist motivation and quality-of-life: In search of the missing link. In M. Uysal & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research (pp. 233–250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2288-0_13

Davitti, E., & Braun, S. (2020). Analysing interactional phenomena in video remote interpreting in collaborative settings: implications for interpreter education. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 14(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2020.1800364

Duda, T. (2021). Digital interpreting tools as a new perspective for cultural and natural tourist routes. In Proceedings of the 37th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA) (pp. 3551–3556).

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Farsia, L., & Nahriah, H. M. (2021). The Importance of Working Conditions for Interpreters. Accentia: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(2), 64-71.

Fida, W. N., Mayunita, S., Al-Ghaniyuh, L. Z., & Tan, C. (2025). Digitalization of local cultural narratives as a strategy to strengthen communication and branding of sustainable community-based tourism in Siompu, South Buton Regency. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sabangka, 4(03), 254–262.

Gavioli, L. (2015). Negotiating territories of knowledge: On interpreting talk in guided tours. Interpreters’ Newsletter, 20, 73–86. https://iris.unimore.it/handle/11380/1100025

Hale, S., & Napier, J. (2013). Research methods in interpreting: A practical resource. Bloomsbury.

Hu, X., Halim, H. A., & Zin, Z. M. (2025). Translation of English film titles into Chinese: A pragmatic and socio-cultural adaptation perspective. World Journal of English Language, 15(7), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n7p308

Iswanto, D., Irsyad, Z., & Istiqlal, I. (2025). Utilization of local culture as a tourism marketing instrument. Aurora: Journal of Emerging Business Paradigms, 2(1), 48-58.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Jimenez-Crespo, M. (2022). Specialized practices in translation settings. In J. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), Introduction to translation and interpreting studies (pp. 104–130). Wiley.

Katan, D., & Taibi, M. (2021). Translating cultures: An introduction for translators, interpreters and mediators (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178170

Liddicoat, A. J. (2016). Translation as intercultural mediation: setting the scene. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 24(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1125934

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Mendoza-Mori, A., & Sprouse, R. (2023). Hemispheric Quechua: Language education and reclamation within diasporic communities in the United States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2023(280), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2022-0024

Meyerhoff, M. (2025). Māori–English contact in New Zealand: Verbal hygiene practices and evaluative outcomes. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2025.2512895

Mitchell, V., & Tonasket, J. (2023). Indigenous language access final report: Provincial Language Services. Provincial Language Services, Provincial Health Services Authority. Retrieved from https://www.phsa.ca/our-services-site/Documents/Indigenous-language-access-report.pdf

Morales Domínguez, A. A. (2022). Intercultural communication and interpretation of heritage: Role of the tourism guide in mediation. Explorador Digital, 6(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v6i2.2170

Napier, J. (2016). Linguistic coping strategies in sign language interpreting. Gallaudet University Press.

O’Hagan, M. (2012). From fan translation to crowdsourcing: Consequences of Web 2.0 user empowerment in audiovisual translation. In M. O’Hagan & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Audiovisual translation and media accessibility at the crossroads (pp. 23–41). Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207812_004

Pöchhacker, F. (2022). Introducing interpreting studies (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186472

Purwani, E. S., Sukmana, O., & Salviana, V. (2024). The threat of extinction of Lampung regional language, Indonesia: A phenomenological view. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 7(5), 90–96.

Rahman, A., Wibawa, B., & Sumantri, S. (2022). Develop English electronic module for tourism through analysis of learner's and context. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 48-57.

Reiß, K., & Vermeer, H. J. (1984). Towards a general theory of translational action. Routledge.

Rudvin, M. (2021). The cultural turn in Community Interpreting. A brief analysis of epistemological developments in Community Interpreting literature in the light of paradigm changes in the humanities. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 5, 21–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v5i.150

Septiyana, L., Sari, Y. A., & Muhammad, H. (2021). Degradation of Lampung language on Marga Sekampung community in Gunung Raya, East Lampung. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 13(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v13i2.30870

Sharma, B. K., & Gao, S. (2021). Language and intercultural communication in tourism. Routledge.

Sollid, H. (2022). Sámi language education policy and citizenship in Norway. In T. I. Meisingset & H. Sollid (Eds.), Indigenising education and citizenship: Perspectives on policies and practices from Sápmi and beyond (pp. 133–152). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215053417-2022-08

Tipton, R., & Furmanek, O. (2016). Dialogue interpreting: A guide to interpreting in public services and the community. Routledge.

Trisnawati, I. K., & Netta, A. (2020). Strategies in simultaneous interpreting: A review. Accentia: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(2), 63-69

UNESCO. (2025). Indigenous languages decade (2022-2032). UNESCO Publishing.

Valerian, E. (2021). The strategies of translation of Bahasa Indonesia-English in two Indonesia tourism websites. Kata Kita-Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching, 9(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.9.2.136-143

Vermeer, H. J., & Chesterman, A. (2021). Skopos and commission in translational action. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader (4th ed., pp. 219–230). Routledge.

Wang, T., & McLaughlin, C. (2023). The multiplicity and dynamics of the interpreter’s roles in mediating cultural differences: A qualitative inquiry based on an international collaborative teacher professional development programme. Language and Intercultural Communication, 23(4), 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2112208

Weng, L., Liang, Z., & Bao, J. (2020). The effect of tour interpretation on perceived heritage values: A comparison of tourists with and without tour guiding interpretation at a heritage destination. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100431

Wiramarta, K., Dewi, N. P. D. U., Krishna, I. B. W., & Yogiswari, K. S. (2022). Identification of translation strategies application by tourism practitioner for cultural-specific item. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 22(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v22i1.47655

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zhang, W., Davitti, E., & Braun, S. (2024). Charting the landscape of remote medical interpreting: an international survey of interpreters working in remote modalities in healthcare services. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2024.2382488

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37598/accentia.v5i2.2517